Azumo vs B12 Consulting: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Azumo (3.9/5) edges ahead of B12 Consulting (3.7/5) overall. Azumo is the better choice for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience.. B12 Consulting is the stronger option for buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian agency founded by physics researchers.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Azumo vs B12 Consulting: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Azumo | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium |
| Team size | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | US buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience. | Buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian agency founded by physics researchers. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangGraph, CrewAI | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
Azumo vs B12 Consulting: overview
Azumo
Azumo is a nearshore software development agency founded in 2016 and headquartered in San Francisco, with roughly 110 employees spread across South America, North America, and Asia. It builds production-grade agentic systems using LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen, coordinating multiple models and tools to complete multi-step business processes. Its smaller headcount means it is better suited to a single dedicated-team engagement than a multi-workstream enterprise program spanning several concurrent teams.
B12 Consulting
B12 Consulting was founded in 2012 by a group of PhDs in Physics sharing a passion for complex problem solving, headquartered in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium with an additional Brussels presence, and roughly 35 FTE. It is an agency expert in artificial intelligence, data science, and custom software development, with a technical, research-adjacent culture reflecting its founders' academic backgrounds.
Services and capabilities: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Capability | Azumo | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Framework / platform | Azumo | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | ✓ |
| LangGraph | ✓ | N/A |
| AutoGen | ✓ | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Criterion | Azumo | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Dimension | Azumo | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents, Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Buyers wanting a small, technically rigorous Belgian agency for a well-scoped project, Complex data-science-adjacent agentic AI problems suited to a research-oriented team |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Azumo vs B12 Consulting: pros and cons
| Azumo | |
|---|---|
| + | Named, current production experience across three separate multi-agent orchestration frameworks |
| + | Nearshore staffing (South/North America) keeps time zones aligned with US clients |
| + | ~110-person team stays small enough for direct engineering access without large-firm account layers |
| + | Founded 2016 with a decade of nearshore delivery track record |
| - | Smaller team than the largest firms on this list limits very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public enterprise-scale compliance certifications are less documented than at larger competitors |
| - | Delivery model depends on continued nearshore talent availability across multiple countries |
| B12 Consulting | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded by PhDs in Physics, giving it an unusually research-adjacent technical culture |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operating history since 2012 |
| + | Brussels presence alongside Louvain-la-Neuve headquarters gives access to EU institutional buyers |
| + | Compact ~35 FTE team keeps senior staff hands-on across every engagement |
| - | Very small team (~35 FTE) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Fewer named large-enterprise case studies than other agencies on this list |
Who should choose Azumo?
Azumo is the right choice for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience..
Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Who should choose B12 Consulting?
B12 Consulting is the right choice for buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian agency founded by physics researchers..
Founded by PhDs in Physics, giving it a research-adjacent, deeply technical culture uncommon among agencies of its size.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | B12 Consulting |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Azumo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Azumo ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs B12 Consulting (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Azumo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
| Use case | Azumo fit | B12 Consulting fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Buyers wanting a small, technically rigorous Belgian agency for a well-scoped project | Limited | Strong | B12 Consulting |
| Complex data-science-adjacent agentic AI problems suited to a research-oriented team | Limited | Strong | B12 Consulting |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Azumo vs B12 Consulting
Azumo (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.. It is best for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience..
B12 Consulting (3.7/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian agency founded by physics researchers.. If your situation matches those criteria, B12 Consulting is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Azumo vs B12 Consulting FAQ
Is Azumo better than B12 Consulting?
Azumo (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Azumo is better for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience.. B12 Consulting is better for buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian agency founded by physics researchers..
How do Azumo and B12 Consulting differ in pricing?
Azumo uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). B12 Consulting uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Azumo or B12 Consulting?
Azumo is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Azumo and B12 Consulting?
Azumo's primary differentiator is: nearshore agency with named production experience across langgraph, crewai, and microsoft autogen.. B12 Consulting's primary differentiator is: founded by phds in physics, giving it a research-adjacent, deeply technical culture uncommon among agencies of its size.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 11–50), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.